The use of explosive munitions in densely populated urban settings, such as the M107 projectile, poses severe risks to civilian lives and infrastructure. When such actions occur in regions like Gaza or other parts of Palestine, which are often characterized by high population density and vulnerable living conditions, the consequences can be particularly catastrophic. This article argues that the use of even a single M107 projectile in these areas by any organization, whether a formal military or a rebel group, should be unequivocally classified as a war crime and a crime against humanity.
The Nature of M107 Projectiles
The M107 is a type of artillery shell, used in howitzers, known for its high explosive power. It weighs 100 pounds, and contains 15 pounds of TNT. In an urban setting like Gaza, the use of such a weapon can lead to significant civilian casualties and widespread destruction of civilian properties, including essential infrastructure like hospitals, schools, and residential buildings.
International Humanitarian Law and War Crimes
International humanitarian law, particularly the Geneva Conventions, explicitly seeks to protect civilian populations and properties during armed conflicts. The principles of distinction, proportionality, and precaution are fundamental to this legal framework. Firing a weapon like the M107 into a densely populated area violates these principles:
- Distinction: This principle mandates the differentiation between combatants and non-combatants. In urban settings, achieving such distinction is inherently challenging, making the use of high-explosive munitions particularly problematic.
- Proportionality: Any military advantage gained by using such munitions must be weighed against the potential for civilian harm. Given the destructive nature of the M107, its use in populated areas is likely disproportionate.
- Precaution: All feasible precautions must be taken to minimize civilian harm. The use of a weapon with a wide impact radius like the M107 in urban areas runs counter to this obligation.
The Context of Gaza and Palestine
Gaza and parts of Palestine, characterized by high population density, poverty, and limited access to essential services, are particularly vulnerable to the effects of explosive weapons. The use of the M107 in such contexts not only causes immediate loss of life and injury but also exacerbates long-term humanitarian crises.
Implications of War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity
Classifying the use of M107 projectiles in these settings as war crimes and crimes against humanity has significant implications. It mandates international accountability and justice for the victims. Such a classification would also serve as a deterrent against the use of indiscriminate and disproportionate force in conflict zones.
Conclusion
The international community must unequivocally regard the use of weapons like the M107 in densely populated areas of Gaza or Palestine as a war crime and a crime against humanity. This stance is essential not only for the protection of innocent lives but also for upholding the principles of international law and human rights. It is imperative for peace and justice that all parties in conflicts, regardless of their size or political objectives, adhere strictly to the rules of war. Failure to do so undermines the very foundations of international peace and security.
